Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Comment 4 gil cattaneo If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Generic, Shell-api, Java Disabled plugins:


Uploader: Fautaur
Date Added: 21 December 2013
File Size: 66.31 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 20521
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Fedora Account System Username: Package is not relocatable. Package does not generate any conflict.

Download jsmpp JAR 2.1.0 with all dependencies

Test run failed [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Package Review Show other bugs. Sources contain only permissible code or content.

Central Repository: com/googlecode/jsmpp/jsmpp/

Changelog in prescribed format. Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: SourceX is a working URL. Final provides and requires are sane see attachments. Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: File names are valid UTF Generic, Shell-api, Java Disabled plugins: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.



All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.


If package contains pom. Description gil cattaneo Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: Permissions on files are set properly. This site requires JavaScript to be enabled to function correctly, please enable it. Comment 4 gil cattaneo Packages jsmppp-2.1.0.jar try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.

[SMS] Update to jsmpp – Sakai

Login [x] Log in using an account from: Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Spec file is legible and written in American English. Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Comment 3 Michael Simacek Package consistently uses macros instead of hard-coded directory names.


Requires correct, justified where necessary.